There was a time in my life when I awaited the announcement of the Oscar nominations the way some people await the NFL draft. (There was also a time in my life when I weighed in at 130 lbs., bought things just because they caught my eye, and sang Janis Joplin songs at parties. Things change.)
In those days, I went to at least one movie every week, and even when I became an old married lady, I could reliably count on having seen most (at least) of the Oscar nominees plus the most-buzzed-about non-nominees. Now? I can count on my fingers the number of times I've been in a movie theater in the past 12 months -- one hand! And for what may be the first time ever, I haven't seen any of the Best Picture nominees: Not even ONE! I've hardly seen any of the nominated films at all, but that doesn't mean I don't have an opinion!
Best Picture x9
Nine nominees is too many. I respect that the Academy decided to increase the number of nominees because, in a good year, there would be more than five movies deserving of a nom. I think it had more to do with competing against the Golden Globes than with honoring quality per se, though. (The GG split movies into Best Comedy and Best Drama, so they end up with a total of ten.) Who knows when we'll see another annus mirabilis like 1939, another year like last one when they nominated ten films. I'm not sure that 2011 really compares with 1939 (nor did 2010).
Omissions
I should probably keep my mouth shut, since I'm about the only person who has enjoyed the comic stylings of the most unpopular hosts in Oscar history. With all due respect for Billy Crystal, I'm not sure he has the chops any more. Obviously a nostalgic choice rather than a substantive one, but hardly the end of the world. Still better than Rob Lowe's Snow White production number, eh?
Anonymous
Just because it's a period movie, it gets a costume nom. Phooey.
Girl with the Dragon Tattoo
Not so much a grip as an expression of surprise, because I thought this was a shoo-in for more honors, including at least Adapted Screenplay. But then, I didn't even see the movie, so what do I know?
Best Supporting Actor
It's almost always the most interesting category, and while I'd rather Ken Branagh had been omitted just on general principles, it's pretty cool that Nick Nolte, Max Von Sydow and Jonah Hill (JONAH HILL, folks!) got nods. As happy as I am for young Jonah (yes, I remember your bit part in The 40-Year-Old Virgin), it's gotta be Max Von Sydow, right? Right? C'mon Academy voters: Do the right thing by one of the world's great actors (and one of the world's most amazing voices).
Albert Nobbs
What the frak? I had never even heard of it -- alas, how low have the mighty fallen, that I'd have to actually look up a multiple-time Oscar nominee on wikipedia. It sounds great, so I'll definitely have to check it out. The behind-the-scenes story is almost as fascinating -- Glenn Close starred in a stage version and worked for more than 15 years to bring about a movie adaptation. She cowrote the thing and even wrote the song. (Hey: Why wasn't THIS song nominated?)
Hugo's the Best
I haven't seen it, but I already know it's my pic for Best Picture. We put off going because the kids hadn't read the book, and the book was unobtainable. I ordered through SlowBooks.net, and maybe after it gets here we'll have family reading night again, push on through Hugh Cabret, and catch it at the second-run theater. And then I'll just redouble my efforts to convince you it's the Best Picture winner, though my arguments will carry more weight. (Be warned.)
Good night, movie fans!
In those days, I went to at least one movie every week, and even when I became an old married lady, I could reliably count on having seen most (at least) of the Oscar nominees plus the most-buzzed-about non-nominees. Now? I can count on my fingers the number of times I've been in a movie theater in the past 12 months -- one hand! And for what may be the first time ever, I haven't seen any of the Best Picture nominees: Not even ONE! I've hardly seen any of the nominated films at all, but that doesn't mean I don't have an opinion!
Best Picture x9
Nine nominees is too many. I respect that the Academy decided to increase the number of nominees because, in a good year, there would be more than five movies deserving of a nom. I think it had more to do with competing against the Golden Globes than with honoring quality per se, though. (The GG split movies into Best Comedy and Best Drama, so they end up with a total of ten.) Who knows when we'll see another annus mirabilis like 1939, another year like last one when they nominated ten films. I'm not sure that 2011 really compares with 1939 (nor did 2010).
Omissions
- Harry Potter. Seriously -- I challenge anyone to say that War Horse is a more stirring celebration of courage or more epic, or that Extremely Loud & Incredibly Close is more emotional, or that any of those nine films is a better exploration of the darkesses and heroism of which the human spirit is capable.
- Muppets. If EL&IC is a better move than The Muppets, then I'll eat the nearest hat. Anti-felt-creature bias, plain and simple.
- Some songs. There couldn't possibly have been only two nomination-worthy songs that whole year. Somebody in the music division of MPAA needs to get over herself and give a songwriter a break. Two nominations? I'm happy for at least this much love for The Muppets, though.
I should probably keep my mouth shut, since I'm about the only person who has enjoyed the comic stylings of the most unpopular hosts in Oscar history. With all due respect for Billy Crystal, I'm not sure he has the chops any more. Obviously a nostalgic choice rather than a substantive one, but hardly the end of the world. Still better than Rob Lowe's Snow White production number, eh?
Anonymous
Just because it's a period movie, it gets a costume nom. Phooey.
Girl with the Dragon Tattoo
Not so much a grip as an expression of surprise, because I thought this was a shoo-in for more honors, including at least Adapted Screenplay. But then, I didn't even see the movie, so what do I know?
Best Supporting Actor
It's almost always the most interesting category, and while I'd rather Ken Branagh had been omitted just on general principles, it's pretty cool that Nick Nolte, Max Von Sydow and Jonah Hill (JONAH HILL, folks!) got nods. As happy as I am for young Jonah (yes, I remember your bit part in The 40-Year-Old Virgin), it's gotta be Max Von Sydow, right? Right? C'mon Academy voters: Do the right thing by one of the world's great actors (and one of the world's most amazing voices).
Albert Nobbs
What the frak? I had never even heard of it -- alas, how low have the mighty fallen, that I'd have to actually look up a multiple-time Oscar nominee on wikipedia. It sounds great, so I'll definitely have to check it out. The behind-the-scenes story is almost as fascinating -- Glenn Close starred in a stage version and worked for more than 15 years to bring about a movie adaptation. She cowrote the thing and even wrote the song. (Hey: Why wasn't THIS song nominated?)
Hugo's the Best
I haven't seen it, but I already know it's my pic for Best Picture. We put off going because the kids hadn't read the book, and the book was unobtainable. I ordered through SlowBooks.net, and maybe after it gets here we'll have family reading night again, push on through Hugh Cabret, and catch it at the second-run theater. And then I'll just redouble my efforts to convince you it's the Best Picture winner, though my arguments will carry more weight. (Be warned.)
Good night, movie fans!
busy
guilty
tired
amused
mischievous
bitchy
okay
enthralled